期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

Journal of Modern Business Administration. 2022; 2: (2) ; 38-41 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.jmba.20220027.

Analysis of the prior rights in Article 32 of the Trademark Law——Take the "QIAODAN" trademark infringement case as an example
浅析《商标法》三十二条中的在先权利——以“乔丹”商标侵权案为例

作者: 夏刘繁 *

浙江工商大学法学院 浙江杭州

*通讯作者: 夏刘繁,单位:浙江工商大学法学院 浙江杭州;

发布时间: 2022-08-30 总浏览量: 57

摘要

在当代社会,自然人尤其是公众人物的姓名、肖像、艺术形象等人格标识的商业化利用现象已屡见不鲜,尤其在商标领域,当某个人物突然爆红,随之而来的是各个商家立马将该名人的姓名申请注册成为商标,很明显这种注册行为不是由于这个姓名本身是多么具有美感,而是看中了该姓名背后的巨大的经济利益,有学者提出“名人就是人格化的商标”。本文将以“乔丹”商标侵权案为例,来浅析在先姓名权与公开权。

关键词: 公开权;在先权利;商标权;不良影响

Abstract

In the present moment, the commercial use of personalityidentification such as the names, portraits, and artistic images of natural persons, especially in the field of trademarks, when a certain figure suddenly popular, the merchant was moved by the wind and immediately applied for the name of the celebrity to be registered as a trademark, it is obvious that this registration behavior is not because of how beautiful the name itself is, but the huge economic interests behind the name, some scholars have proposed that "celebrities are trademarks of personification". This article will take the "QIAODAN" trademark infringement case as an example to analyze the prior name rights and publicity rights.

Key words: Right of Publicity; Prior right; Trademark right; Adverse effect

参考文献 References

[1] 王利明.试论人格权的新发展[J].法商研究,2006(5).

[2] 姚辉.关于人格权商业化利用的若干问题[J].法学论坛,2011(6).

[3] 杨立新、林旭霞.论人格标识商品化权及民法保护[J].福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版,2006.

[4] 温世杨.人格权支配属性辨析[J].法学,2013(5).

[5] 冯象.鲁迅肖像权问题[J].读书,2001(3).

[6] 谢晓尧.商品化权:人格符号的利益扩张与衡平[J].法商研究,2005(3).

[7] 周云川.商标授权确权诉讼—规则与判例[M].法律出版社,2014.

[8] 汪泽.商标法对在先姓名权的保护——简评两起涉及姓名权保护的商标异议案[J].中华商标2005(5).

引用本文

夏刘繁, 浅析《商标法》三十二条中的在先权利——以“乔丹”商标侵权案为例[J]. 现代工商管理, 2022; 2: (2) : 38-41.