摘要
随着《区域全面经济伙伴关系协定》（RCEP）的签署，中国对外直接投资迎来了新的历史契机。本文选取除中国以外的其余14个成员国，时间跨度涵盖2007年至2022年，利用这些国家的面板数据进行实证分析，从资源导向型、战略获取型和效率导向型的对外直接投资目的进行研究。研究结论：一是中国对RCEP成员国直接投资的资源导向型动机较弱；二是战略获取型直接投资不成立；三是存在效率导向型投资动机。
关键词： 对外直接投资；RCEP成员国；稳健性检验
Abstract
With the signing of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), China's FDI has ushered in a new historical opportunity. This paper selects the other 14 member countries except China, covering the period from 2007 to 2022, and uses the panel data of these countries for empirical analysis. Research conclusion: First, China's direct investment in RCEP member countries has a relatively weak resource-oriented motivation; second, the strategic acquisition-oriented direct investment does not hold; third, there exists an efficiency-oriented investment motivation.
Key words： Foreign direct investment; RCEP member states; Robustness test
参考文献 References
[1] 许丹婷.共谋远景凝聚发展共识[N].广西日报,2023-09-18(005).
[2] 袁波,王蕊,潘怡辰等.RCEP正式实施对中国经济的影响及对策研究[J].国际经济合作,2022,(01):3-13.
[3] Özcan K,Olcay Ç.The causality relationship between foreign direct investment and economic growth in RCEP countries[J].Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences,2024,(1):95-110.
[4] Sid diqui A,Iqbal A.In search of spatial interdependence of US outbound FDI in the MENA region[J].The World Economy,2018,41(5):1415-1436.
[5] Kong Q,Wu P,Wang Z. Outward foreign direct investment operation modes and reverse technology spillovers: Implications for the quality of economic growth[J]. International Review of Economics and Finance, 2024,(92)1628-1639.
[6] 潘素昆,杨雅琳.“一带一路”国家基础设施和中国对外直接投资区位选择[J].统计与决策,2020,(10):133-138.
[7] 鲍静海,韩小蕊.我国对“一带一路”沿线国家直接投资的出口效应[J].中国流通经济,2021,(04):82-92.
[8] 刘丰.全民健康、人力资本投资与经济高质量发展[J].上海经济研究,2023,(11):89-105.
[9] 吴若楠.中国对RCEP国家的直接投资与出口技术复杂度 [J].价格月刊,2022,(03):55-61.
[10] 王永钦,杜巨澜,王凯.中国对外直接投资区位选择的决定因素:制度、税负和资源禀赋[J].经济研究,2014,49(12): 126-142.
[11] 李梅,柳士昌.对外直接投资逆向技术溢出的地区差异和门槛效应——基于中国省际面板数据的门槛回归分析[J].管理世界,2012,(01):21-32.
[12] 王巧,尹晓波.数字经济背景下中国对RCEP成员国直接投资的影响因素与潜力研究[J].经济问题探索,2022, (12):181-190.